Martin (2013: 77):
Blogger Comments:
[1] For the generalisation lost in Martin's network, see the previous post.
[2] To be clear, in SFL Theory, the grammar is interpreted as the realisation of meaning. So declarative is "grouped" with interrogative, not imperative, under the superordinate indicative, because these two types of indicative are the congruent realisation of propositions, in contradistinction to imperative, which is the congruent realisation of a proposal.
[3] To be clear, the structural realisation of TENSE is specified in a verbal group network, not a clause network.
[4] To be clear, the problem with the MOOD network in Halliday & Matthiessen is easily rectified by adding a superscript 'I' to the system INDICATIVE TYPE, and a superscript 'T' to the system COMMENT. Problems with Martin's networks are not so easily rectified, as this blog has demonstrated.
No comments:
Post a Comment